von Redaktion WIM'O | 02.05.25 Literatur: 1. Harley, B. Confronting the crisis of confidence in management studies: Why senior scholars need to stop setting a bad example. Academy of Learning and Education. 18 (2019), 286-297; Losse, B. Die Tyrannei der Top Five. WirtschaftsWoche. Heft 19 (2024), 36-37 2. Starbuck, W. How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organization Science 16 (2005), 180–200. 3. Frey, B. Publishing as prostitution? – Choosing between one’s own ideas and academic success. Public Choice 116 (2003), 205-223; Gomez-Mejia, L. & Balkin, D. Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal 35 (1992), 921-955. 4. Daft, R. & Lewin, A. Can organization studies begin to break out of the normal science straitjacket? An editorial essay. Organization Science 1 (1990), 1-9; Dunbar, R. & Bresser, R. Knowledge generation and governance in management research. Journal of Business Economics 84 (2014), 129-144. 5. Bresser, R. & Balkin, D. Restoring a taste for science: Enhancing strategic knowledge by changing the governance of academic journals. Strategic Management Review 3 (2022), 67-97; Losse, B. Unerwünschte Nestbeschmutzer. WirtschaftsWoche. Heft 33 (2024), 38-39. 6. Park, M., Leahey, E. & Funk, R.J. Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature. 613, (2023); 138-144 (2023); Chu, J.S.G. & Evans, J.A. Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. PNAS. 118, Heft 41 (2021), 1-5; Bresser, R. Die qualitative Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Ergebnisse, Forschung & Lehre (12/2023), 918-919. 7. Angrist, J. & Pischke, J-S. The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 24, Heft 2 (2010), 3–30; Hollenbeck J., & Wright P: (2017). Harking, sharking, and tharking: Making the case for post hoc analysis of scientific data. Journal of Management 43(2017), 5-18. 8. Davis J. Specialization, fragmentation, and pluralism in economics. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 26 (2019), 271-293; Agrawal R., & Hoetker G. (2007) A Faustian bargain? The growth of management and its relationship with related disciplines. Academy of Management Journal 50 (2007), 1304-1322; Hambrick, D. The disintegration of strategic management: It’s time to consolidate our gains. Strategic Organization 2 (2004), 91-98. 9. Aguines, H., Cummings, C., Ramani, R. & Cummings, T. “An A is an A”: The new bottom line for valuing academic research. Academy of Management Perspectives. 34 (2020), 135-154; Walsh, J. Embracing the sacred in our secular world. Academy of Management Review 36 (2011), 215-234. 10. Balkin, D. & Bresser, R. Scholarly books as complementary contributions to “A’s”. Academy of Management Perspectives 35 (2021), 562-566. 11. Williamson, O. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. (New York, The Free Press, 1975); Coase, R. The nature of the firm. Economica 4 (1937), 386-405.